The necessity to commercialise aspects of New Zealand's national parks to achieve sustainable funding
New Zealand's national parks are vital ecological and recreational assets, but they face significant funding shortfalls. The Department of Conservation (DOC) struggles to secure sufficient financial resources to maintain and protect these lands. Meanwhile, the demand for commercial recreation on public conservation lands has grown considerably over the past three decades, making it a necessary tool for sustainable funding.
However, the commercialisation of national parks remains a contentious issue, with many holding outdated views that fail to acknowledge the economic realities and conservation benefits of well-managed commercial operations. This article explores the necessity of commercialising aspects of New Zealand's national parks, the concerns surrounding this approach, and recommendations for a balanced, sustainable strategy.
The funding shortfall and the need for commercialisation
The DOC faces a critical funding gap that threatens the sustainability of New Zealand’s national parks. Conservation efforts require significant investment in infrastructure, habitat protection, visitor facilities, and ecological monitoring. Traditional funding sources, such as government allocations and philanthropic contributions, are insufficient to meet these growing needs. By incorporating commercial recreation activities in a responsible and sustainable manner, the DOC can generate additional revenue to support conservation efforts without compromising environmental integrity.
As DOC faces funding shortfalls, it has been floating new money-raising ideas such as charging at car parks and consulting on fees for access to some public conservation land. Despite the growing need for revenue, DOC’s departmental budget increased from $402 million in 2017/18 to $710 million in the last financial year. However, funding increases have been absorbed by rising costs or allocated to ring-fenced programmes.
The department administers New Zealand's largest recreation network, which includes more than 14,000km of tracks, 326 campsites, approximately 950 backcountry huts, and numerous heritage sites across one-third of the country. The future of nearly a third of all huts and tracks managed by DOC is uncertain, as the agency faces a 30 percent shortfall in funding needed to maintain them.
The department is reviewing its visitor network—including huts, tracks, car parks, signs, and public toilets—to address the financial deficit. The network currently comprises 15,000 kilometres of track (longer than all of New Zealand's state highways combined), 950 huts, 300 campsites, and over 2,000 toilets.
Budget 2024 saw a decrease in funding from previous years, including cuts to programmes, leading to a total reduction of $134 million. The agency was required to find savings of 6.5 percent as part of government cost-cutting measures, amounting to $31.3 million per year from 2024/25, and announced job reductions.
While this does not necessarily mean a 30 percent reduction of the network, cuts are under consideration. Asset removal would be a last resort, but options such as introducing paid car parking trials and consulting on access charges are being explored.
Climate change is further exacerbating maintenance costs, with increasing expenditures on storm damage repairs. For example, Cyclone Gabrielle inflicted $90 million in damages to approximately 500 assets. Ensuring visitor safety and long-term sustainability requires a reevaluation of which tracks and facilities are financially viable in the face of recurring climate-related damage.
Lessons from the UK: alternative funding models for public parks
In the UK, public parks are an essential part of the social and ecological fabric of communities, providing significant economic, social, and environmental benefits. However, similar to New Zealand’s national parks, they face funding challenges due to reductions in public subsidies. In response, innovative business models have been implemented to ensure long-term sustainability.
Key approaches include:
Generating income through concessions and events: Public parks in the UK host paid events, food stalls, and recreational concessions, generating revenue to support park maintenance.
Encouraging community-led management: Several parks have transitioned to local co-operatives, trusts, or social enterprises, fostering local ownership and diversified funding sources.
Diversifying revenue streams: Parks in the UK have explored new income sources, such as eco-tourism activities, environmental services, and even taxation models that ensure long-term funding.
Exploring commercial developments: Some urban parks have incorporated commercial spaces, such as cafes and event venues, to enhance visitor experiences while generating sustainable revenue.
New Zealand can adopt similar strategies to diversify funding streams while preserving the natural integrity of national parks.
The evolving role of commercial recreation in national parks
Commercial recreation on public conservation lands has become widely accepted, with various benefits:
Revenue generation: Fees from commercial operators provide a direct source of funding for park maintenance and conservation.
Enhanced visitor experiences: Guided tours and outdoor adventure services offer structured, safe experiences for visitors.
Economic benefits: Commercial recreation creates jobs and stimulates local economies through tourism.
Despite these advantages, opposition to commercialisation persists. Many critics argue that commercial recreation undermines independent recreation and could lead to excessive development. However, these concerns can be mitigated through careful management and regulation.
Concerns and misconceptions about commercialisation
Fear of over-commercialisation
Some believe that increased commercial activity will transform national parks into profit-driven enterprises. However, commercial operations can be limited in scale and designed to align with conservation goals.
Impact on independent recreation
There is a perception that commercial visitors disrupt independent experiences. While conflicts may arise, strategies such as zoning and visitor education can help maintain a balance.
Environmental degradation
Concerns over noise, overcrowding, and habitat disturbance are valid. However, well-managed commercial activities can enforce sustainability standards, often more effectively than independent use.
Opposition to private profit from public lands
Some object to businesses generating revenue from public resources. However, structured concession fees ensure that commercial operators contribute financially to conservation efforts.
Recommendations
Develop a sustainable funding model
Introduce higher concession fees for commercial operators to ensure a steady revenue stream for conservation projects.
Adopt a balanced policy framework
Establish guidelines that balance commercial and independent recreation needs while prioritising conservation.
Monitor and evaluate commercial activities
Implement regular assessments of commercial operations to ensure compliance with environmental and visitor experience standards.
Engage stakeholders in decision-making
Include conservation groups, recreationists, local communities, and tourism operators in policy discussions to create consensus-driven solutions.
Invest in infrastructure to support sustainable tourism
Use revenue from commercial activities to maintain and improve park facilities, ensuring long-term visitor satisfaction and environmental protection.
Conclusion
The commercialisation of aspects of New Zealand's national parks is not only necessary but also beneficial when managed responsibly. Given the DOC's significant funding shortfall, leveraging commercial recreation can provide a sustainable financial model that supports both conservation and public access. Lessons from the UK demonstrate the potential for innovative funding models, ensuring public conservation lands remain financially viable and ecologically preserved. A well-balanced approach will secure the future of New Zealand’s national parks for generations to come.
Comments